01
Bring the proposals together.
Start with the requested scope and up to three contractor proposals for the same job.
Requested scope.pdf
Contractor proposal.pdf
CLARITY BEFORE COMMITMENT
Every quote.
The whole
picture.
Turn competing contractor proposals into clear comparisons and confident owner approvals.
Designed for property teams. Built around the details.
A little more clarity. A lot less back-and-forth.
Three proposals.
One clear comparison.
One clear comparison.
ScopeAligned
Unanswered questions2 to review
CEDAR COURT · FLOORING
FROM PROPOSALS TO A CLEAR DECISION
Compare the scope
Resolve the unknowns
Share the full picture
MEET YOUR COMPARISON WORKSPACE
The details make
the difference.
One contractor includes disposal. Another excludes trim. See what each quote actually covers, with the source one click away.
Cedar Court
1,200 sq ft · Luxury vinyl plank · 3 proposals
| REQUESTED SCOPEClick any item for evidence | OF Oakline Floors$8,450Submitted total | FC Fieldworks Co.$9,200Submitted total | HI Harbor Interiors$9,780Submitted total |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVP flooring · 1,200 sq ft | |||
| Installation & labor | |||
| Subfloor preparation | |||
| Removal & disposal | |||
| Transitions & trim | |||
| Workmanship warranty |
A lower price doesn’t always mean the same scope.
Oakline excludes trim and hasn’t stated disposal. Clarify both before comparing like for like.
Explore the tabs and select a scope item.Product concept. No live document processing.
LESS CHASING. MORE CLARITY.
From a stack of quotes
to a shared understanding.
02
Make the differences visible.
Review aligned scope items, check the original wording, and resolve what isn’t clear.
IncludedExcludedNot stated
03
Give the decision context.
Prepare a concise owner pack with original totals, scope differences, and open questions.
Owner approval packReady for your review
A CLEARER HANDOFF
Good decisions
deserve good context.
A comparison your team can work with. A summary your owner can understand. A record you can come back to.
Explore the owner packDESKTOP TO DECISIONApp & mobile concepts
DESIGN EXPLORATION · ILLUSTRATIVE INTERFACESBUILT AROUND REPEAT WORK
For the people who
keep properties moving.
For teams whose week includes competing proposals, contractor questions, and someone waiting for a clear recommendation.
Keep your next unit turn moving.
Bring flooring proposals, scope questions, and an owner’s decision into one organized handoff. Built around repeat work across your portfolio.
- Reusable scopes for recurring work
- A clear record for every property
- A simpler handoff to the owner
Portfolio perspectiveEXAMPLE WORKFLOW
Cedar Court · Unit 204
Flooring replacement · 3 proposals
MAKE THE VALUE TANGIBLE
What could a clearer
process give back?
Explore the potential value of time saved across recurring comparisons. Adjust the assumptions to reflect your team.
Illustrative capacity value, not measured results or guaranteed cash savings.
1 comparison40 comparisons
Potential monthly capacity value$675/ mo
15 hrsgiven back
15 comparisons × 60 minutes ÷ 60 × $45/hour
A SIMPLE PLACE TO START
Built for your workload.
Room to grow.
Proposed plans for recurring professional use.
All pricing is illustrative and subject to pilot validation.
START WITH ONE JOB
Single comparison
For an occasional decision that deserves a clearer view.
$59 / pack
- One job, up to three proposals
- Scope comparison & clarification list
- Owner-ready summary
THE PROFESSIONAL PILOT Start here
Professional
For property teams with a regular flow of competing quotes.
$249 / month
- Up to 15 supported comparison packs
- Guided initial workflow setup
- Evidence-linked scope review
- Approval packs & project history
LOOKING AHEAD
Portfolio
A future plan for a broader team and a busier portfolio.
$399 / month
- Higher-volume pack allowance
- Shared templates & team review
- Portfolio-level decision history
A pack covers one job, its scope, and up to three proposals. Supported files and usage limits will be defined before a live pilot.
A FEW MORE DETAILS
Good questions.
Clear answers.
Start with the scope. Keep the judgment with your team.
The proposed product organizes scope, prices, source evidence, and unresolved questions. Your team chooses the contractor and approves the work. The lowest submitted price is not automatically the most complete offer.
It means the proposal does not explicitly address that item. It is not an exclusion and does not prove the contractor omitted the work. The next step is to ask for clarification; we never fill in an invented price.
The concept is designed around a simple export handoff: review proposals here, then use the approval pack in your existing process. Integrations with property platforms have not been built or promised.
This is a local concept website with fictional documents and illustrative pricing. Live document processing, accounts, billing, and external submissions are not connected. The sample comparison and printable report can be explored now.
The proposed allowance is one job, its requested scope, and up to three proposals. File formats, page limits, reruns, and support would be defined before a real pilot. The $249 monthly pilot and $399 portfolio plan shown here are pricing hypotheses.
Less back-and-forth.
More forward.
Help shape a better way to compare maintenance proposals.